Memories of Lincoln — Reading Companion

(0 User reviews) 76

In Category - Science Fiction Utopias

Authors: Whitman, Walt, 1819-1892 Digital Source: Project Gutenberg Gutenberg Release Year: 2019 First Publication Year: Not confirmed

Key Word: Lincoln, Abraham, 1809-1865 -- Poetry Target Reader: Readers of public-domain and historical texts

Book Edition: Project Gutenberg digital edition Book Language: en

Edition facts

Words 9,173

Reading time 40 min

Text sections 2

The catalog record for Memories of Lincoln — Reading Companion provides practical reading context through 9,173 words, 40 min estimated reading time, and 2 detected text sections.

The text analysis averages about 27.2 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Lincoln, Abraham, 1809-1865 -- Poetry,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

Source: Project Gutenberg record #60505

Whitman's poems on Lincoln, framed by a foreword insisting Lincoln is not reduced to literature. The collection includes 'When Lilacs Last in the Dooryard Bloom'd' and 'O Captain! My Captain!' plus war lyrics like 'The Wound-Dresser,' with vivid hospital scenes.

Editorial Edition Score 4.5/5

★★★★★ ★★★★★

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated

Description quality20 pts
Title & short description10 pts
Source metadata20 pts
Text length15 pts
Chapters / structure15 pts
EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

File: pg60505

Read the Text

Whitman did not subject Lincoln to the literary but to the human motive. Lincoln does not become a literary figure by his touch. Does not become a man in a book. After Whitman is done with him Lincoln still remains Lincoln. No way reduced. No way aggrandized. Only better understood. His background does not become a book. His background remains what it was. Remains life. Generic life. As life is where life finds life at the root. I may let Whitman put in a word for himself. Whitman said to me of Lincoln:

"Lincoln is particularly my man--particularly belongs to me; yes, and by the same taken I am Lincoln's man: I guess I particularly belong to him: we are afloat in the same stream--we are rooted in the same ground."

To know the Lincoln of Whitman you want to know the Whitman of Whitman. Whitman was literary. But he was not first of all literary. Or last of all literary. First of all he was human. He was not the leaves of a book. He was the bone and flesh of a man. Yes, he was that something or other not bone or flesh which is also of a man--which finally is the man. Simply literary analysis can make little out of Whitman. He does not yield to the scalpel. He is not to be resurrected from an inkpot. His voice falls in with the prophet voices. He was not unlettered. He knew the alphabet. But he kept all alphabetical, arrogance well in hand. The letter was kept in hand. The spirit was left free. You cannot buy a ticket for Athens or Weimar or Paris or London or Boston and reach Whitman. He is never reached in that circle. The literary centers do not lead to him. You have got to travel to him by another route. You go East and find the Buddhistic canticles. You consult the Zoroastrian avatars. And you take the word of Jesus for a great deal. And you may hit Socrates on the way. And you keep on with your journey, touching here and there in European history certain men, certain influences. Going into port now and then. Never going where men compete for literary judgment. Never where men set out to acquit themselves immortally as artists. Keeping forever close to the careless rhythms of original causes. So you go on. And go on. And by and by you arrive at Whitman. Not by way of the university. Not by way of Shakespeare. Not by way of the literary experts and adepts. But by human ways. To try to find Whitman by way of Shakespeare or Molière would be hopeless. I do not disparage the other routes to other men. I am only describing this route to Whitman. This route, which is the only route. Whitman chants and prays and soars. He Is not pretty. He is only beautiful. He is not beautiful with the beauty of beauty. He is beautiful with the beauty of truth. The pen can easily miss Whitman. But the heart reaches him direct. Whitman is therefore the best route to Lincoln. The same process which provides Whitman for you provided Lincoln for. Whitman. Whitman said to me again about Lincoln:

"There was no reason why Lincoln should not have been a prophet rather than a politician; he was in fact a divine prophet-politician; in him for almost the first time prophecy had something to say in politics. I shouldn't wonder but that in another age of the world Lincoln would have been a chosen man to lead in some rebellion against ecclesiastical institutions and religious form and ceremony."

Continue Reading →

The foreword to this collection, written by editor E. Haldeman-Julius, makes an emphatic claim: Whitman did not subject Lincoln to the literary motive but to the human motive. Lincoln, it insists, remains Lincoln—not a man in a book. This framing sets up the poems that follow as something other than conventional elegy. The volume gathers Whitman's well-known Lincoln poems—'When Lilacs Last in the Dooryard Bloom'd,' 'O Captain! My Captain!'—alongside a section titled 'Lyrics of the War' that includes 'The Wound-Dresser' and 'Spirit Whose Work Is Done.' The catalog subject is simply 'Lincoln, Abraham, 1809-1865 — Poetry,' but the war lyrics extend far beyond direct Lincoln portraiture.

The Foreword's Argument Against Literary Treatment

The foreword, likely by Haldeman-Julius, asserts that Whitman's Lincoln is not a literary figure. It claims Lincoln's background remains 'life. Generic life.' The prose is deliberately unliterary itself—short, staccato sentences, repeated words, a refusal of subordinate clauses. It tells us Whitman said of Lincoln: 'Lincoln is particularly my man—particularly belongs to me; yes, and by the same taken I am Lincoln's man.' The foreword insists that literary analysis 'can make little out of Whitman' and that one cannot reach him via Athens, Weimar, Paris, London, or Boston. This is a striking editorial position for a volume that is, after all, a book of poems. The reader is warned not to expect a conventional poetic tribute, but something more like a shared identity.

The Wound-Dresser: A Hospital Counterpoint

Among the war lyrics, 'The Wound-Dresser' offers a starkly physical counterpoint to the Lincoln elegies. The speaker returns in dreams to hospital tents, 'bearing the bandages, water and sponge.' The poem dwells on specific injuries: 'the crush'd head,' 'the neck of the cavalry-man with the bullet through and through,' 'the stump of the arm, the amputated hand.' The attendant follows 'holding a tray, he carries a refuse pail, / Soon to be fill'd with clotted rags and blood.' The speaker is 'faithful' and 'does not give out,' but notes 'deep in my breast a fire, a burning flame.' This is not the Lincoln of public mourning but the war's intimate aftermath. The poem's repeated phrase 'in silence, in dreams' projections' suggests a private, recurring ordeal.

Catalog Subject vs. Actual Content

The catalog lists only one subject: 'Lincoln, Abraham, 1809-1865 — Poetry.' Yet the volume's contents are split between poems directly about Lincoln and a substantial section of war lyrics that mention him not at all. 'Beat! Beat! Drums!' is a martial call. 'Come Up from the Fields Father' is a domestic scene of a letter arriving. 'The Wound-Dresser' is a hospital monologue. 'Spirit Whose Work Is Done' addresses the 'spirit of dreadful hours' and 'forests of bayonets.' The Lincoln poems themselves—'When Lilacs Last in the Dooryard Bloom'd,' 'O Captain! My Captain!,' 'Hush'd Be the Camps Today,' 'This Dust Was Once the Man'—occupy only a portion of the book. The foreword's argument that Lincoln is not reduced to literature is partly borne out by the fact that the book is not entirely about Lincoln.

Readers coming to this volume expecting a unified Lincoln elegy will find instead a collection that juxtaposes public mourning with the raw sensory details of wartime hospitals. The foreword's insistence on the 'human motive' over the 'literary motive' invites a reading that attends to the poems' physicality and their resistance to easy symbolism. The war lyrics, especially 'The Wound-Dresser,' reward attention as evidence of what Whitman chose to place alongside his Lincoln poems.

Reading Whitman’s Lincoln poems, I kept thinking how grief becomes a place you visit, not a page you turn. The hospital scenes in “The Wound-Dresser” felt less like history and more like a held breath. That same quiet lingering came back with Rosemary and Pansies — Story, Setting & Ideas, where memory sits in small, fragrant details rather than grand gestures. Some books stay because they let us sit with what hurts, tenderly and without rushing away.