The Oxford Book of English Verse, 1250-1900 — Context and Discussion

(0 User reviews)   98
Quiller-Couch, Arthur, 1863-1944 [Editor] Project Gutenberg 2021 Not confirmed
English poetry Readers of public-domain and historical texts
Project Gutenberg digital edition en

Edition facts

Words 213,418
Reading time 928 min
Text sections 49

This digital edition of The Oxford Book of English Verse, 1250-1900 — Context and Discussion is described by source-level measurements including 213,418 words, 15 hr 28 min estimated reading time, and 49 detected text sections.

The text analysis averages about 23.0 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “English poetry,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

Arthur Quiller-Couch's 1900 anthology spans English verse from the 13th to the 19th century, arranging poets by birth order and including ballads grouped in the mid-17th century. The editor prioritizes aesthetic appeal over textual fidelity, excising stanzas and preferring 'the more beautiful to the better attested reading.'
Share
Editorial Edition Score 4.9/5

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated
  • Description quality20 pts
  • Title & short description10 pts
  • Source metadata20 pts
  • Text length15 pts
  • Chapters / structure15 pts
  • EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

Read the Text

id scho bur the flour, And eik hir faderis air; Off lusty laitis and he honour, Meik bot and debonair: Scho wynnit in a bigly bour, On fold wes nane so fair, Princis luvit hir paramour In cuntreis our allquhair.

Thair dwelt a lyt besyde the King A foull Gyand of ane; Stollin he has the Lady ying, Away with hir is gane, And kest her in his dungering Quhair licht scho micht se nane; Hungir and cauld and grit thristing Scho fand into hir waine.

He wes the laithliest on to luk That on the grund mycht gang: His nailis wes lyk ane hellis cruk, Thairwith fyve quarteris lang;

ring] reign. fald] enfold. ying] young. fairheid] beauty. air] heir. laitis] manners. bot and] and also. scho wynnit] she dwelt. bigly] well-built. fold] earth. paramour] lovingly. our allquhair] all the world over. a lyt besyde] a little, (i. e. close) beside. of ane] as any. kest] cast. dungering] dungeon. into hir waine] in her lodging. hellis cruk] hell-claw.

Thair wes nane that he ourtuk, In rycht or yit in wrang, Bot all in schondir he thame schuk, The Gyand wes so strang.

He held the Lady day and nycht Within his deip dungeoun, He wald nocht gif of hir a sicht For gold nor yit ransoun-- Bot gif the King mycht get a knycht, To fecht with his persoun, To fecht with him beth day and nycht, Quhill ane wer dungin doun.

The King gart seik baith fer and neir, Beth be se and land, Off ony knycht gif he mycht heir Wald fecht with that Gyand: A worthy Prince, that had no peir, Hes tane the deid on hand For the luve of the Lady cleir, And held full trew cunnand.

That Prince come prowdly to the toun Of that Gyand to heir, And fawcht with him, his awin persoun, And tuke him presoneir, And kest him in his awin dungeoun Allane withouten feir, With hungir, cauld, and confusioun, As full weill worthy weir.

quhill] until. dungin doun] beaten down. his awin persoun] himself. withouten feir] without companion.

Syne brak the bour, had hame the bricht Unto her fadir fre. Sa evill wondit wes the Knycht That he behuvit to de; Unlusum was his likame dicht, His sark was all bludy; In all the world was thair a wicht So peteouss for to se?

The Lady murnyt and maid grit mane, With all her mekill mycht-- ‘I luvit nevir lufe bot ane, That dulfully now is dicht; God sen my lyfe were fra me tane Or I had seen yone sicht, Or ellis in begging evir to gane Furth with yone curtass knycht.’

He said ‘Fair lady, now mone I De, trestly ye me trow; Take ye my serk that is bludy, And hing it forrow yow; First think on it, and syne on me, Quhen men cumis yow to wow.’ The Lady said ‘Be Mary fre, Thairto I mak a vow.’

Quhen that scho lukit to the sark Scho thocht on the persoun, And prayit for him with all hir hart That lowsit hir of bandoun,

the bricht] the fair one. likame] body. lowsit hir of. bandoun] loosed her from thraldom.

Quhair scho was wont to sit full merk Into that deip dungeoun; And evir quhill scho wes in quert, That was hir a lessoun.

Sa weill the Lady luvit the Knycht That no man wald scho tak: Sa suld we do our God of micht That did all for us mak; Quhilk fullily to deid was dicht, For sinfull manis sak, Sa suld we do beth day and nycht, With prayaris to him mak.

This King is lyk the Trinitie, Baith in hevin and heir; The manis saule to the Lady, The Gyand to Lucefeir, The Knycht to Chryst, that deit on tre And coft our synnis deir; The pit to Hele with panis fell, The Syn to the woweir.

The Lady was wowd, but scho said nay With men that wald hir wed; Sa suld we wryth all sin away That in our breist is bred. I pray to Jesu Chryst verray, For ws his blud that bled, To be our help on domisday Quhair lawis ar straitly led.

quert] prison. coft] bought. straitly led] strictly carried out.

The saule is Godis dochtir deir, And eik his handewerk, That was betrayit with Lucefeir, Quha sittis in hell full merk: Borrowit with Chrystis angell cleir, Hend men, will ye nocht herk? And for his lufe that bocht us deir Think on the BLUDY SERK!

Sweet rois of vertew and of gentilness, Delytsum lily of everie lustynes, Richest in bontie and in bewtie clear, And everie vertew that is wenit dear, Except onlie that ye are mercyless.

Arthur Quiller-Couch's The Oxford Book of English Verse, 1250–1900 opens with a preface that lays bare the editor's principles: he has 'ranged over the whole field of English Verse' to 'choose the best,' but his method is far from neutral. He admits to excising 'weak or superfluous stanzas' and preferring 'the more beautiful to the better attested reading.' This editorial stance—valuing aesthetic effect over scholarly exactitude—shapes the entire collection, making it as much a work of taste as of preservation.

The anthology's structure is equally deliberate. Poets appear 'as nearly as possible in order of birth,' with ballads clustered in the mid-17th century to fill 'a languid interval between two winds of inspiration.' Quiller-Couch also modernizes spelling gradually, except for Spenser and Milton, whose archaic forms he retains. These choices reveal a curator intent on accessibility, yet not without controversy for textual purists.

Editorial Interventions and Their Traces

The excerpts show Quiller-Couch's hand in several places. In the anonymous ballad 'All under the willow-tree,' glosses appear at the foot of the page for words like 'dent' (fasten) and 'gre' (grow), yet the text itself lacks reference marks—a deliberate choice to avoid 'disfiguring' the page. This practice aligns with his stated aim to serve 'those who already love poetry' and to 'implant that love in some young minds.'

More telling is his admission of excising stanzas. While the excerpts do not reveal which poems were cut, the preface confirms that he 'often excised weak or superfluous stanzas when sure that excision would improve.' For instance, the inclusion of George Crabbe's 'Meeting' and 'Late Wisdom'—both compact, epigrammatic pieces—may reflect such trimming. The reader encounters a curated selection, not a complete oeuvre.

Quiller-Couch also notes that he has 'sometimes thought it consistent with the aim of the book to prefer the more beautiful to the better attested reading.' This principle is evident in the inclusion of William Blake's 'To the Muses' and 'To Spring,' where the texts follow the poet's own editions rather than later scholarly corrections. The anthology thus presents a version of English verse filtered through one editor's aesthetic judgment.

The Ballad Cluster and Its Placement

Quiller-Couch gathers most ballads into the middle of the 17th century, a decision he defends as avoiding 'a dispute-royal' and filling a perceived gap between Milton and the Restoration. The excerpt includes one such ballad, 'All under the willow-tree,' with its refrain 'My love is dead, / Gone to his death-bed / All under the willow-tree.' This placement, however, is anachronistic: many ballads are older, and grouping them by theme rather than chronology obscures their historical development.

The editor's rationale reveals a bias toward narrative continuity. He sees the mid-17th century as 'a languid interval between two winds of inspiration—the Italian dying down with Milton and the French following at the heels of the restored Royalists.' By inserting ballads here, he creates a folk interlude that bridges two literary movements. Yet this arrangement is a construct, not a reflection of actual literary history.

Readers should note that the ballads' original dates are often uncertain. Quiller-Couch's grouping imposes a coherence that the texts themselves may not support. The anthology thus offers a curated experience of English poetry, where editorial design sometimes overrides historical accuracy.

Spelling Modernization and Its Limits

Quiller-Couch's preface outlines a graduated approach to spelling: 'In the very earliest poems inflection and spelling are structural, and to modernize is to destroy. But as old inflections fade into modern the old spelling becomes less and less vital.' Accordingly, he retains archaic forms in early works but modernizes later ones, except for Spenser and Milton, whom he exempts 'to conciliate' scholars.

The excerpts illustrate this policy. In the ballad 'All under the willow-tree,' the text uses 'corse' for 'corpse' and 'ouph' for 'elf,' with glosses provided. These archaisms are preserved because the poem is early. In contrast, George Crabbe's 'Meeting' (born 1754) uses modern spelling: 'Damon,' 'flame,' 'bosom.' The transition is seamless, but the reader may not notice the editorial hand.

Quiller-Couch acknowledges that his method may not satisfy scholars, but he prioritizes readability. The result is a text that feels consistent to the modern eye, yet subtly erases the linguistic diversity of English verse. Readers interested in historical orthography should consult facsimile editions; this anthology smooths over those differences.

Quiller-Couch's anthology is best approached as a personal canon, not a neutral survey. His preface openly states his criteria: beauty over accuracy, accessibility over scholarship. Readers should note the editorial interventions—excised stanzas, modernized spelling, anachronistic groupings—and consider how these shape their encounter with the poems. The collection rewards those who read with an awareness of its construction, treating it as a document of late-Victorian taste as much as a treasury of English verse.

Years of tending Quiller-Couch’s anthology taught me how a poem’s true life often hides in its softer, unpolished corners. I feel that same quiet charm in The Bashful Earthquake, & Other Fables and Verses — Story, Setting & Ideas, whose fables prefer the whimsical to the merely correct. Both books whisper, not shout, preferring a felt beauty over the sharpest, most reliable fact. A gentle kinship, indeed.

There are no reviews for this eBook.

0
0 out of 5 (0 User reviews )

Add a Review

Your Rating *
There are no comments for this eBook.

Reader reflection

Your personal reading reflection

Build a private reading journal entry for this title.

Your progress 0 / 10
1

How far have you progressed with this book?

2

What was your overall reaction to the book?

3

Is this a title you would suggest to others?

4

How demanding did the text feel?

Related eBooks